Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Grupo Carrefour BrasilGrupo Carrefour Brasil
VS
B&M RetailB&M Retail
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Avenida Tucunaré 125, Barueri, São Paulo, BR, 06460-020

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
818/1000Good

Reunimos uma equipe com mais de 70.000 colaboradores que representam a diversidade deste país. Hoje, somos um dos maiores empregadores do Brasil. Junto com os nossos fornecedores e parceiros, estamos comprometidos em satisfazer e encantar os consumidores todos os dias, ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,586
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
B&M Retail

B&M Retail

Estuary Commerce Park , Liverpool, Merseyside, GB, L24 8RJ

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

B&M is a fast-growing discount retailer, operating from over 750 high street and out of town stores across the UK, with a team of over 38,000! In the UK, we offer customers a broad range of FMCG brands and non-grocery products at sensational prices. Our aim is to prov...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,673
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
B&M Retail

B&M Retail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Carrefour Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&M Retail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Grupo Carrefour Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Carrefour Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - B&M Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&M Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Grupo Carrefour Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
B&M Retail

B&M Retail

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil company and B&M Retail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil and B&M Retail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil and B&M Retail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Grupo Carrefour Brasil or B&M Retail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Grupo Carrefour Brasil or B&M Retail ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil and B&M Retail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Grupo Carrefour Brasil and B&M Retail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA