Comparison Overview
Grendene S/A
Grendene S/A
Av. Pedro Grendene, 131. Bairro Volta Grande, Farroupilha, 95180-000, BR
Last Update: 20/09/2026
Se você deseja construir uma carreira em uma das maiores empresas do Brasil, a Grendene é o seu lugar. Se você quer estar em uma empresa diferente, com criatividade brasileira, tecnologia global e inovação constante, faça parte da nossa equipe. Se você busca desen...
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1000 Stanley Drive, New Britain, CT, US, 06053
Last Update: 21/09/2026
For the builders and protectors, for the makers and explorers, for those shaping and reshaping our world through hard work and inspiration, Stanley Black & Decker provides the tools and innovative solutions you can trust to get the job done—and we have since 1843. You ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Grendene S/A
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grendene S/A in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Grendene S/A (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grendene S/A cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Grendene S/A
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.