Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

GreenBayGreenBay
VS
Cox EnterprisesCox Enterprises
GreenBay

GreenBay

228 North End Road, London, W14 9NU, GB

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.greenbaysupermarket.co.uk/
820/1000Good

We are a team of driven & passionate people on a mission to challenge the current food system: Powered by technology, GreenBay makes it easy, fun and convenient for people to try a plant-based lifestyle by connecting them to new and emerging brands that are positively...

NAICS:51
NAICS Definition:Information
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Cox Enterprises

Cox Enterprises

6305 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, 30328, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.coxenterprises.com
677/1000Weak

Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by pro...

NAICS:51
NAICS Definition:Information
Employees:35,429
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
GreenBay

GreenBay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cox Enterprises

Cox Enterprises

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GreenBay in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cox Enterprises in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - GreenBay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GreenBay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cox Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cox Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
GreenBay

GreenBay

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GRE1481622
Cox Enterprises

Cox Enterprises

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COX53102453112425
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
COX1495114112425

FAQ

Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between GreenBay company and Cox Enterprises company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between GreenBay and Cox Enterprises, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between GreenBay and Cox Enterprises, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - GreenBay or Cox Enterprises ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - GreenBay or Cox Enterprises ?
Between GreenBay and Cox Enterprises, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between GreenBay and Cox Enterprises, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES