Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Gravity Payments » GRA1770325911

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GRA1770325911)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-85
Company Score Before Incident685 / 1000
Company Score After Incident600 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERGRA1770325911
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party software vulnerability
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, and...
INCIDENT DATE21/08/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Gravity Payments's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Gravity Payments Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Gravity Payments breach identified under incident ID GRA1770325911.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Gravity Payments's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gravity-payments, the number of followers: 99777, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 231 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 685 and after the incident was 600 with a difference of -85 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Gravity Payments and their customers.

On 22 August 2025, Gravity Payments disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Gravity Payments Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Information of Over 2,200 Individuals".

Gravity Payments disclosed a data breach affecting 2,278 individuals due to a vulnerability in third-party software, which an unknown actor exploited to access files stored in the company’s customer relationship management system.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Customer relationship management system, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, and other PII, with nearly 2278 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Customer notifications, dedicated assistance line.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Free credit monitoring and identity restoration services through Experian (90-day enrollment window), dedicated assistance line (833-931-5050).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerability in third-party software...exploited to access files and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating security flaw in third-party software. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to files stored in the company’s customer relationship management system. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, Social Security numbers, and other PII. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 2,278 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a limited set of files and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data integrity. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References