Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Graver Technologies, LLCGraver Technologies, LLC
VS
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Graver Technologies, LLC

Graver Technologies, LLC

200 Lake Drive, Glasgow, Delaware, 19702, US

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gravertech.com
761/1000Fair

Graver Technologies, LLC serves the industrial filtration, separation and purification needs of companies around the globe. We offer a broad selection of high performance specialty ion exchange resins, proprietary adsorbents and filtration products for the most demand...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:178
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

1000 Stanley Drive, New Britain, CT, US, 06053

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

For the builders and protectors, for the makers and explorers, for those shaping and reshaping our world through hard work and inspiration, Stanley Black & Decker provides the tools and innovative solutions you can trust to get the job done—and we have since 1843. You ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:29,016
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Graver Technologies, LLC

Graver Technologies, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graver Technologies, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Graver Technologies, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graver Technologies, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Graver Technologies, LLC

Graver Technologies, LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Graver Technologies, LLC or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Graver Technologies, LLC or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Graver Technologies, LLC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3