Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Gozo Channel Company Limited » GOZ1770194696

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOZ1770194696)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-12
Company Score Before Incident819 / 1000
Company Score After Incident807 / 1000
Company LinkView Gozo Channel Company Limited Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERGOZ1770194696
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE03/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Gozo Channel Company Limited's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Gozo Channel Company Limited Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Gozo Channel Company Limited breach identified under incident ID GOZ1770194696.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Gozo Channel Company Limited's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gozo-channel-company-limited, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Transportation/Trucking/Railroad and the number of employees: 61 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 819 and after the incident was 807 with a difference of -12 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Gozo Channel Company Limited and their customers.

On 24 October 2023, Gozo Channel Company disclosed Cyber Attack issues under the banner "Gozo Channel Cyber Attack".

The Gozo Channel Company, which operates ferry services between Malta and Gozo, confirmed a cyber attack on its systems earlier this week.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Administrative IT systems.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Swiftly contained, and began remediation that includes Technical teams restoring affected systems, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement reassuring operations.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Reassurance that ferry operations remain unaffected.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating targeted certain administrative IT systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyber attack on its systems...administrative IT systems. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyber attack on its systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating internal IT Systems Disrupted and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating nature of the attack or its origin have not been disclosed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating contingency measures for limiting the attack’s scope and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating technical teams are actively working to restore affected systems. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating administrative IT systems targeted. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (40%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (60%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (40%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (30%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (40%)

Sources & References