Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Government of Pakistan » GOV1782923516

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOV1782923516)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-123
Company Score Before Incident768 / 1000
Company Score After Incident645 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERGOV1782923516
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDEncrypted data
INCIDENT DATE23/06/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Government of Pakistan's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Government of Pakistan Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Government of Pakistan breach identified under incident ID GOV1782923516.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Government of Pakistan's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/govtofpakistan, the number of followers: 22927, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 2665 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 768 and after the incident was 645 with a difference of -123 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Government of Pakistan and their customers.

On 15 May 2026, Unnamed Pakistani government entity disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Pakistan Government Entity Hit by Ransomware".

A Pakistani government entity fell victim to a ransomware attack last week, resulting in encrypted data that was later restored from backup systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Encrypted data.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Data restored from backups.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Persistent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure; need for standardized cybersecurity compliance and auditing controls, and recommending next steps like Establish and operationalize cybersecurity operations centers (SOCs) within six months; adhere to cloud and cybersecurity frameworks; implement zero-trust architecture; enforce centralized identity management and consistent security policies, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering PKCERT mandates SOC establishment; upcoming Pakistan Information Security Framework 2026 (PISF 2026).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Service Exhaustion Flood (T1499.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack last week, resulting in encrypted data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating persistent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack last week, resulting in encrypted data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating resulting in encrypted data that was later restored from backup systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (implied data exfiltration common in modern ransomware). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (commonly uses obfuscation to evade detection) and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating persistent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack (commonly uses C2 over web protocols). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Endpoint Denial of Service: Service Exhaustion Flood (40%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (60%)

Sources & References