Comparison Overview
Google Cloud
Google Cloud
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 07/07/2026
Google Cloud accelerates every organization’s ability to digitally transform its business and industry. We deliver enterprise-grade solutions that leverage Google’s cutting-edge technology, and tools that help developers build more sustainably. Customers in more than 20...
SAP
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE
Last Update: 07/10/2026
SAP is a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI. We help organizations run mission-critical operations across finance, procurement, supply chain, human resources, and customer experience -and move from systems that record work to systems that can help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Google Cloud
SAP
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Google Cloud has 757.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
SAP has 488.24% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Google Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Google Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Google Cloud
SAP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.