Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Google Chrome » GOO1779200646

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOO1779200646)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-5
Company Score Before Incident675 / 1000
Company Score After Incident670 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERGOO1779200646
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORBrowser-stored credentials exploitation
DATA EXPOSEDPasswords and session cookies
INCIDENT DATE13/05/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Google Chrome's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Google Chrome Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Google Chrome breach identified under incident ID GOO1779200646.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Google Chrome's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/google-chrome, the number of followers: 26575, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 675 and after the incident was 670 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Google Chrome and their customers.

Google Chrome Users recently reported "VoidStealer Malware Exploits Chrome’s App-Bound Encryption to Steal User Data", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A recently identified malware strain, VoidStealer, is targeting Google Chrome users on Windows, employing a sophisticated method to circumvent Chrome’s App-Bound Encryption, a feature introduced to safeguard stored passwords and session cookies.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Google Chrome on Windows, and exposing Passwords and session cookies.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exact distribution methods remain unclear and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating voidStealer targets Google Chrome users on Windows. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Web Session Cookie (T1539) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploits Chrome’s App-Bound Encryption to steal session cookies and Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (T1555.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating circumvents Chrome’s encryption to safeguard stored passwords. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extract sensitive data from browser-stored credentials. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating information-stealing malware refines techniques to evade detection. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (T1553.004) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating bypasses Chrome’s App-Bound Encryption security defense and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating operates without requiring admin-level access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Drive-by Compromise (50%)
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Credential Access
Steal Web Session Cookie (90%)
Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)

Sources & References