Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Goodwin University » GOO1778006566

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOO1778006566)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-139
Company Score Before Incident774 / 1000
Company Score After Incident635 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERGOO1778006566
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal data of hundreds of...
INCIDENT DATE03/12/2025
STATUSConcluded

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Goodwin University's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Goodwin University Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Goodwin University breach identified under incident ID GOO1778006566.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Goodwin University's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/goodwinuniversity, the number of followers: 11198, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: 663 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 774 and after the incident was 635 with a difference of -139 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Goodwin University and their customers.

On 28 December 2025, Goodwin University disclosed ransomware issues under the banner "Goodwin University Hit by Qilin Ransomware Attack, Exposing Sensitive Data of Hundreds".

Goodwin University, a private nonprofit institution in East Hartford, Connecticut, disclosed a ransomware attack that compromised the personal data of hundreds of individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data of hundreds of individuals, with nearly Hundreds (at least 682 identified) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification via U.S. mail on April 16, 2026.

The case underscores how Concluded, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification via U.S. mail on April 16, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access had occurred and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating network disruption identified. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack attributed to Qilin ransomware group. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of hundreds of individuals compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating health insurance details, personal health information exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group posted about incident on dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in ransomware details. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack attributed to Qilin ransomware group and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating network disruption identified. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected after network disruption and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access confirmed by cybersecurity experts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Data Destruction (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References