Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Goodstone Group LLC » GOOSOU1782167103

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GOOSOU1782167103)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-29
Company Score Before Incident829 / 1000
Company Score After Incident800 / 1000
Company LinkView Goodstone Group LLC Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERGOOSOU1782167103
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive customer data (names, addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Goodstone Group LLC's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Goodstone Group LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Goodstone Group LLC breach identified under incident ID GOOSOU1782167103.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Goodstone Group LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/goodstone-group-llc, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Professional Training and Coaching and the number of employees: 30 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 829 and after the incident was 800 with a difference of -29 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Goodstone Group LLC and their customers.

Southern Design RV recently reported "Southern Design RV Data Breach by CMD Organization", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Southern Design RV, a Ballarat, Victoria-based dealer specializing in new and used Australian-made caravans, has been listed as a victim by the emerging cybercrime group CMD Organization.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive customer data (names, addresses, emails, phone numbers, purchase details).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating likely relying on initial access brokers (IABs) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cMD Organization...operating under the guise of improving cybersecurity. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating low-maturity but well-networked operator and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive customer data (names, addresses, emails, phone numbers). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated sensitive customer data...names, addresses, emails, phone numbers and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating purchase details...posted as a sample on its leak site. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...auctioning the stolen data for 5 Bitcoin and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating posted as a sample on its leak site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on data encryption, but ransom demanded and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating listed as a victim...posted as a sample on its leak site. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating public auctions for stolen data...competitive bidding. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (40%)
Valid Accounts (50%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (30%)
Credentials from Password Stores (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Defacement (60%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (50%)

Sources & References