Comparison Overview
Golden Corral Corporation
Golden Corral Corporation
5400 Trinity Road, Ste. 309, Raleigh, 27607, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
The right place. The best people. Golden Corral, a leading chain restaurant company, is just the place for people with a focus on being the best. Opening our doors in 1973, our history is marked by innovation, growth and caring about people. From day one, we establis...
Waffle House, Inc.
5986 Financial Dr NW, Norcross, 30071, US
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Waffle House has been serving Good Food Fast® since 1955. We started in one restaurant serving Avondale Estates, GA, and then grew into a national brand with more than 1,900 restaurants in 25 states providing career paths to 40,000 + employees. The love and devotion o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Golden Corral Corporation
Waffle House, Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Golden Corral Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Waffle House, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Golden Corral Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Golden Corral Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Waffle House, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Waffle House, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Golden Corral Corporation
Waffle House, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.