Comparison Overview
Global Ports Holding
Global Ports Holding
Third Floor, 35 Albemarle Street, London, London, GB, W1S 4JD
Last Update: 15/12/2025
Global Ports Holding is the world's largest cruise port operator with an established presence in the Caribbean, Mediterranean, Asia-Pacific regions, including extensive commercial port operations in Montenegro. Global Ports Holding (GPH) was established in 2004 as an ...
Anglo-Eastern
17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ., HK
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew tr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Global Ports Holding
Anglo-Eastern
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Global Ports Holding in 2026.
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2026.
Incident History - Global Ports Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Global Ports Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Global Ports Holding
Anglo-Eastern
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.