Comparison Overview
Glasses Direct

Glasses Direct
40 Clifton Street, London, EC2A 4DX, GB
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Founded in 2004, Glasses Direct is the UK’s most trusted online glasses retailer, with over 185,000 reviews on Trustpilot and more than 2 million customers! With its customer-centric ethos, Glasses Direct is changing the way people buy prescription glasses in the UK. Gl...

Azadea Group
P1 & P2, O14 Tower, Abraj Street, Business Bay, Dubai, 22700, AE
Last Update: 31/03/2026
AZADEA Group is a premier lifestyle retail company that owns and operates more than 40+ leading international franchise concepts across the Middle East and Africa. With over 13,500 employees, dedicated offices in every market it operates, and world-class infrastructure,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Glasses Direct







Azadea Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Glasses Direct in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Azadea Group in 2026.
Incident History - Glasses Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Glasses Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Azadea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Azadea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Glasses Direct

Azadea Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.