Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Glasses DirectGlasses Direct
VS
Ahold DelhaizeAhold Delhaize
Glasses Direct

Glasses Direct

40 Clifton Street, London, EC2A 4DX, GB

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Founded in 2004, Glasses Direct is the UK’s most trusted online glasses retailer, with over 185,000 reviews on Trustpilot and more than 2 million customers! With its customer-centric ethos, Glasses Direct is changing the way people buy prescription glasses in the UK. Gl...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:51
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

Ahold, 1506 MA Zaandam, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aholddelhaize.com
724/1000Moderate

Ahold Delhaize is one of the world’s largest food retail groups, we are a leader in supermarkets and e-commerce, and a company at the forefront of sustainable retailing. Our local brands employ around 393,000 associates in around 9,400 local grocery, small format, and s...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:80,837
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Glasses Direct

Glasses Direct

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glasses Direct in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ahold Delhaize in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Glasses Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glasses Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ahold Delhaize (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ahold Delhaize cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Glasses Direct

Glasses Direct

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ahold Delhaize

Ahold Delhaize

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AHO3943639102725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AHO615062825

FAQ

Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Glasses Direct company and Ahold Delhaize company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Glasses Direct and Ahold Delhaize, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Glasses Direct and Ahold Delhaize, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Glasses Direct or Ahold Delhaize ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Glasses Direct or Ahold Delhaize ?
Between Glasses Direct and Ahold Delhaize, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Glasses Direct and Ahold Delhaize, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9