Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » GiveLight Foundation » GIV1773973767

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (GIV1773973767)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-80
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident681 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERGIV1773973767
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORMisconfigured Cloud Storage
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) such...
INCIDENT DATE19/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of GiveLight Foundation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts GiveLight Foundation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the GiveLight Foundation breach identified under incident ID GIV1773973767.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of GiveLight Foundation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/give-light-foundation, the number of followers: 652, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 29 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -80 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on GiveLight Foundation and their customers.

Give Light recently reported "Operation Honoring Heroes", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A recent cybersecurity incident in Tampa Bay, Florida, has exposed sensitive data belonging to veterans and first responders due to a misconfigured cloud storage system managed by the nonprofit organization Give Light.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting AWS S3 bucket, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and military service records, with nearly Thousands (exact number undisclosed) records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured the exposed AWS S3 bucket.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights ongoing risks associated with cloud storage misconfigurations and the critical need for robust data protection measures, particularly for organizations handling sensitive information.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unsecured Amazon Web Services (AWS) S3 bucket lacking proper access controls and Compromise Accounts (T1586) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating misconfigured cloud storage system allowed unauthorized access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included Social Security numbers, names, addresses. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating misconfigured AWS S3 bucket exposed PII and military service records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized parties accessed files in unsecured AWS S3 bucket and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating thousands of records exposed, risk of identity theft persists. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of malicious exploitation reported and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating risk of identity theft and targeted phishing attacks persists. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Compromise Accounts (30%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Collection
Data from Cloud Storage (90%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (20%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References