Comparison Overview
Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
515 E. Gregory Drive, Champaign, IL, US, 61820
Last Update: 09/03/2026
More than business. Business on purpose. We prepare learners to approach business differently, with the goal of making a difference. How do we do it? With intention. From the courses you complete to the events you attend and everything in between, we carefully design th...

Columbia University
West 116 Street and Broadway, New York, NY, US, 10027
Last Update: 01/04/2026
For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign







Columbia University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Columbia University has 83.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Columbia University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Columbia University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Gies College of Business - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Columbia University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.