Comparison Overview

Gi Group

VS

Robert Half

Gi Group

Piazza IV Novembre, 5, Milan, MI, undefined, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Welcome to Gi Group! Your job, Our work! Gi Group is one of the world’s leading companies providing a full range of HR Services. We offer Temporary, Permanent and Professional Staffing Services, Search & Selection and Executive Search as well as Outsourcing, Training, Outplacement and HR Consultancy. It is our mission to contribute to the evolution of the labour market and to emphasize the personal and social value of work. We aim to support people at each stage of their professional career and be at our clients’ side as their businesses grow. Thanks to direct presence and strategic partnerships, we operate in more than 57 countries across Europe, APAC, Americas and Africa. With a team of more than 4.000 colleagues around the world, our global model, solutions and our expertise in a full range of industries and sectors, we are able to provide valuable specialized services to both international and local customers. Ranked globally as one of the largest staffing firms by Staffing Industry Analysts, we are also a global corporate member of the World Employment Federation. In 2021, Gi Group Holding achieved a turnover of more than 3.2 billion euros. Do you want to know more about Gi Group and what we can do for you? Get in touch with us!

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 15,729
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Robert Half

2884 Sand Hill Road Suite 200, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

🔒 At Robert Half, we prioritize your security—if you believe you've encountered a scam or fraudulent recruiter, please report it immediately to https://www.roberthalf.com/us/en/fraud-alert. All Robert Half recruiters communicate using their corporate email address, ending in roberthalf.com. 👋 Welcome to Robert Half. We're the world’s first and largest specialized talent solutions firm, connecting opportunities at great companies with highly skilled job seekers. We provide dynamic contract, temporary, and permanent placement solutions across finance, accounting, technology, marketing, creative, legal, and administrative sectors. 🏆 In the last 12 months, Robert Half has been recognized as one of America’s Most Innovative Companies by Fortune, and with Protiviti, has been named one of the Fortune® World's Most Admired Companies™ and 100 Best Companies to Work For. 🏦 Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: RHI), we’re at the forefront of innovation in talent acquisition.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,722
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gi-group.jpeg
Gi Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gi Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Robert Half
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gi Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Robert Half in 2025.

Incident History — Gi Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gi Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Robert Half (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Robert Half cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gi-group.jpeg
Gi Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robert-half-international.jpeg
Robert Half
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gi Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Robert Half company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Robert Half company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gi Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Robert Half company and Gi Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Robert Half company nor Gi Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Robert Half company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Gi Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Robert Half company nor Gi Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gi Group company nor Robert Half company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gi Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Robert Half company.

Robert Half company employs more people globally than Gi Group company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gi Group nor Robert Half holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H