Comparison Overview
General Mills

General Mills
One General Mills Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, 55426
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We exist to make food the world loves. But we do more than that. General Mills is a place that prioritizes being a force for good, a place to expand learning, explore new perspectives and reimagine new possibilities, every day. We look for people who want to bring their...

Unilever
100 Victoria Embankment, Blackfriars, London, GB, EC4Y 0DY
Last Update: 02/08/2026
Every day, 3.4 billion people around the world enjoy our products - from ground-breaking brands like Hellmann's, Domestos, Dove and Rexona (to name just a few). Our brands lead the way - innovating in their fields, delighting their consumers and powering our business fo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

General Mills







Unilever






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for General Mills in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Unilever in 2026.
Incident History - General Mills (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Mills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Unilever (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Unilever cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

General Mills

Unilever
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.