Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Fyzical » FYZFYZ1766441576

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FYZFYZ1766441576)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-76
Company Score Before Incident764 / 1000
Company Score After Incident688 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFYZFYZ1766441576
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized email access
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) and...
INCIDENT DATE08/12/2024
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Fyzical's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Fyzical Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fyzical breach identified under incident ID FYZFYZ1766441576.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fyzical's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fyzical, the number of followers: 10, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 1 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -76 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fyzical and their customers.

On 22 December 2025, Fyzical Acquisition Holdings, LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Fyzical Acquisition Holdings Data Breach".

Fyzical Acquisition Holdings, LLC, the parent company of FYZICAL Therapy & Balance Centers, reported a significant data breach compromising personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) of at least 1,801 residents of Texas.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Email environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI), with nearly 1801 records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Comprehensive review of compromised data, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice of Data Security Incident posted on website and disclosure to Texas Attorney General.

The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Affected individuals are advised to monitor their credit and identity protection. The company is offering credit monitoring and identity protection services at no cost, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals are advised to monitor their credit and identity protection.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unusual activity was observed in the company’s email environment and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email data, sensitive information viewed/copied and Unsecured Credentials: Email Credentials (T1552.008) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email environment. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection (T1114) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information may have been viewed or copied by an outside party and Data from Information Repositories: Code Repositories (T1213.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of PII/PHI suggests access to stored data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information may have been viewed or copied by an outside party. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware, but data exposure implies impact and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access suggests potential for data tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (80%)
Unsecured Credentials: Email Credentials (70%)
Collection
Email Collection (90%)
Data from Information Repositories: Code Repositories (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References