Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FuretankFuretank
VS
Anglo-EasternAnglo-Eastern
Furetank

Furetank

Korsholmebacke 1, Donsö, SE, 430 82

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.furetank.se
708/1000Moderate

Furetank is a shipping company located on the island of Donsö, with roots in an archipelago tradition dating back to the 18th century. Furetank is committed to a style of shipping where attention to quality and care for the environment, the cargo, the vessels, and our p...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:144
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ., HK

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.angloeastern.com
835/1000Good

Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew tr...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:13,812
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Furetank

Furetank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Furetank in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Furetank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Furetank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Furetank

Furetank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FUR901110725
Anglo-Eastern

Anglo-Eastern

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ANG300092125

FAQ

Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Furetank company and Anglo-Eastern company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Furetank and Anglo-Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Furetank and Anglo-Eastern, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Furetank or Anglo-Eastern ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Furetank or Anglo-Eastern ?
Between Furetank and Anglo-Eastern, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Furetank and Anglo-Eastern, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA