Comparison Overview
Furetank

Furetank
Korsholmebacke 1, Donsö, SE, 430 82
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Furetank is a shipping company located on the island of Donsö, with roots in an archipelago tradition dating back to the 18th century. Furetank is committed to a style of shipping where attention to quality and care for the environment, the cargo, the vessels, and our p...

Anglo-Eastern
17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, ., HK
Last Update: 15/09/2026
Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew tr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Furetank







Anglo-Eastern






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Furetank in 2026.
Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2026.
Incident History - Furetank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Furetank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Furetank

Anglo-Eastern
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.