Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FTAI AviationFTAI Aviation
VS
IberiaIberia
FTAI Aviation

FTAI Aviation

New York, NY, US, 10014

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ftaiaviation.com
797/1000Fair

FTAI Aviation Ltd. (NASDAQ: FTAI) is a leading integrated full-service provider of aftermarket power and maintenance for the most widely-used commercial jet engines. It owns and maintains commercial jet engines with a focus on CFM56 and V2500 engines. FTAI's proprieta...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:386
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Iberia

Iberia

Calle Martínez Villergas 49, Madrid, 28027, ES

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.iberia.com
414/1000Critical

Iberia is Spain’s number-one airline group and the leader in the Europe-Latin America market, with the single greatest array of destinations and flight frequencies. Together with British Airways, we’re part of the IAG Group, with the third-highest receipts in Europe and...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:10,823
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FTAI Aviation

FTAI Aviation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Iberia

Iberia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FTAI Aviation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Iberia has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FTAI Aviation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FTAI Aviation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Iberia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iberia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FTAI Aviation

FTAI Aviation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Iberia

Iberia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IBE1771962749
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBE1767821517
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
THIIBE1774081558

FAQ

Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FTAI Aviation company and Iberia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FTAI Aviation and Iberia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FTAI Aviation and Iberia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FTAI Aviation or Iberia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FTAI Aviation or Iberia ?
Between FTAI Aviation and Iberia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FTAI Aviation and Iberia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA