Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Frost » CITSEFFRO1788892423

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CITSEFFRO1788892423)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-86
Company Score Before Incident782 / 1000
Company Score After Incident696 / 1000
Company LinkView Frost Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCITSEFFRO1788892423
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of millions of...
INCIDENT DATE30/11/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Frost's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Frost Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Frost breach identified under incident ID CITSEFFRO1788892423.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Frost's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/frostbank, the number of followers: 45186, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 5095 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 782 and after the incident was 696 with a difference of -86 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Frost and their customers.

Sefas Innovation Inc. recently reported "Sefas Data Breach Exposes Millions of Bank Customers’ Personal Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In December 2025, Sefas Innovation Inc., a provider of customer-management software to enterprise clients, suffered a data breach allegedly orchestrated by Russian cybercriminals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information of millions of bank customers, with nearly Millions records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Growing cybersecurity risks for third-party vendors handling financial data.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sefas Innovation Inc., a provider of customer-management software to enterprise clients and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor handling financial data for Frost Bank and Citizens Bank. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating customer-management software to enterprise clients, suffered a data breach. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of millions of bank customers compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sefas Innovation Inc., a provider of customer-management software. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach allegedly orchestrated by Russian cybercriminals and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendors handling financial data, potential long-term consequences. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating negligence and breach of third-party beneficiary contract and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating growing cybersecurity risks for third-party vendors handling financial data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (50%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)