Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FRE1786048957)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Freeway Insurance Services, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. breach identified under incident ID FRE1786048957.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Freeway Insurance Services, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/freeway-insurance, the number of followers: 6059, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 1338 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 693 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. and their customers.
On 31 March 2026, Freeway Insurance disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Freeway Insurance Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Customer Information".
Freeway Insurance, a California-based insurance broker and distributor, is under investigation following a data breach that exposed sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) of customers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information (PII).
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Steps taken to secure systems.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within its systems detected on March 31, 2026 and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating external actor had accessed and exfiltrated historical files. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within its systems; third-party investigation and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating external actor accessed systems; no specific vector disclosed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated historical files containing PII (SSNs, financial data) and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating credit/debit card numbers, driver’s license details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating external actor had accessed and exfiltrated historical files and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed sensitive PII; no encryption mentioned. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity detected; no confirmation of destruction and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating historical files accessed; potential manipulation not ruled out. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/freeway-insurance/incident/FRE1786048957
- Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/freeway-insurance
- Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/fre1786048957-freeway-insurance-breach-march-2026/
- Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/freeway-insurance/history
- Freeway Insurance Services, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/freeway-insurance-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf