Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

francesca’s®francesca’s®
VS
H&M GroupH&M Group
francesca’s®

francesca’s®

8760 Clay Road, Houston, 77080, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.francescas.com
728/1000Moderate

Known for offering unique, free-spirited fashion, jewelry and lifestyle products for over 20 years, francesca’s mission is to inspire discovery and celebrate individuality. Our brand purpose #FreeToBeYOU starts with our customer. By creating a space to amplify the voice...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,354
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
H&M Group

H&M Group

Årstaängsvägen 13, Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, 117 75

Last Update: 14/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://hmgroup.com/
662/1000Weak

Founded in 1947, H&M Group is a global design company with ~4,702 stores in 76 markets and 56 online markets. At H&M Group, we believe in making great design available to everyone. It’s essential in everything we do. Our family of brands and business ventures offer cust...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:104,076
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
francesca’s®

francesca’s®

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
H&M Group

H&M Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for francesca’s® in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

H&M Group has 292.16% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - francesca’s® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

francesca’s® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - H&M Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
francesca’s®

francesca’s®

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRA5032350111025
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRA502072925
H&M Group

H&M Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HMG1791815982
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TFGTHEHMGASOWHI1792002776
🔒 Incident : Breach
HMGGOG1791981977

FAQ

Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between francesca’s® company and H&M Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between francesca’s® and H&M Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between francesca’s® and H&M Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - francesca’s® or H&M Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - francesca’s® or H&M Group ?
Between francesca’s® and H&M Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between francesca’s® and H&M Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3