Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Foxsemicon Technology LLC » FOX1770473554

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FOX1770473554)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-106
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident650 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFOX1770473554
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORWebsite defacement, Data exfiltration
DATA EXPOSED5 terabytes of sensitive information
INCIDENT DATE17/01/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Foxsemicon Technology LLC's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Foxsemicon Technology LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Foxsemicon Technology LLC breach identified under incident ID FOX1770473554.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Foxsemicon Technology LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foxsemicon-technology-llc, the number of followers: 84, the industry type: Semiconductor Manufacturing and the number of employees: 22 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 650 with a difference of -106 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Foxsemicon Technology LLC and their customers.

Foxsemicon Integrated Technology Inc. (FITI) recently reported "LockBit Ransomware Gang Targets Taiwan’s Foxsemicon in High-Profile Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Taiwan’s Foxsemicon Integrated Technology Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Company website, and exposing 5 terabytes of sensitive information.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Website restoration.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating hackers defaced the company’s website with a ransom note and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating website defacement, Data exfiltration. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit ransomware gang allegedly carried out the attack. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hackers defaced the company’s website with a ransom note. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers defaced the company’s website with a ransom note and Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating website defacement and data exfiltration suggest access to internal systems. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating claiming to have exfiltrated five terabytes of sensitive information. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 5 terabytes of sensitive information exfiltrated. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating claiming to have exfiltrated five terabytes of sensitive information and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threatening to leak stolen customer data on the darknet. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit ransomware gang allegedly carried out the attack and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers defaced the company’s website with a ransom note. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (50%)
Defense Evasion
Defacement: Internal Defacement (80%)
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (40%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (80%)

Sources & References