Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Foxconn's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Foxconn Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Foxconn breach identified under incident ID SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Foxconn's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foxconn, the number of followers: 478105, the industry type: Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 99265 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 805 and after the incident was 764 with a difference of -41 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Foxconn and their customers.
Samsung recently reported "Russian Cybercriminal Group Exposes 74,000 Fortinet Firewall Credentials in Massive Leak", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A Russian-speaking cybercriminal group inadvertently exposed credentials from nearly 74,000 Fortinet firewalls and VPN gateways worldwide after leaving the data unsecured on a server.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Fortinet firewalls and VPN gateways, and exposing 73,932 unique firewall URLs with credentials, with nearly 73,932 unique firewall URLs records at risk.
In response, and began remediation that includes Credential rotation, MFA enforcement and System upgrades.
The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Assume compromise if domain/IP appears in exposed dataset, Rotate credentials and Enforce MFA.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exposed FortiGate Management Interface to the internet, and exploited vulnerabilities and brute-force attacks and External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including sSL VPN authentication hashes intercepted, and 73,932 unique firewall URLs compromised. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including cracking hashes using a 45-GPU cluster via Hashtopolis, and weak password storage (SHA-256 with salt) and Credentials in Configuration Files (T1552.007) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including configuration files containing sensitive information harvested, and 74,000 Fortinet firewall credentials exposed. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating leveraging cracked passwords to infiltrate Active Directory environments. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating configuration files and classified defense documents exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating automated large-scale harvesting of credentials and configurations. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating turkish NATO defense contractor suffered exfiltration of classified defense documents. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating using cracked credentials to bypass authentication controls and Install Root Certificate (T1553.004) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating intercepting SSL VPN authentication hashes (implied). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potential unauthorized access to Active Directory environments and Account Access Removal (T1531) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating credential rotation and MFA enforcement recommended post-breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Foxconn Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxconn/incident/SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487
- Foxconn CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxconn
- Foxconn Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/samfoxorafordhl1781785487-fortinet-samsung-foxconn-oracle-dhl-breach-may-2025/
- Foxconn CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/foxconn/history
- Foxconn CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/06/18/fortinet-fortibleed-data-leak/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf