What is the official website of Foster Animal Clinic ?

The official website of Foster Animal Clinic is http://www.fosteranimalhospital.com.

What is Foster Animal Clinic's cybersecurity risk score?

Foster Animal Clinic has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 755 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Foster Animal Clinic experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Foster Animal Clinic been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Foster Animal Clinic comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Foster Animal Clinic comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Foster Animal Clinic is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Foster Animal Clinic is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Foster Animal Clinic operate in ?

Foster Animal Clinic operates primarily in the Veterinary industry.

How many employees does Foster Animal Clinic have ?

Foster Animal Clinic employs approximately 1 people worldwide.

Does Foster Animal Clinic own any subsidiaries ?

Foster Animal Clinic presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Foster Animal Clinic have ?

Foster Animal Clinic's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 20 followers.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Foster Animal Clinic does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Foster Animal Clinic have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Foster Animal Clinic maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foster-animal-clinic.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Foster Animal Clinic experienced ?

As of July 1, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Foster Animal Clinic has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Foster Animal Clinic have ?

Foster Animal Clinic has an estimated 613 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FAC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

755

/1000

Fair

780

/1000

Fair

Foster Animal Clinic Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

fosteranimalhospital.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Foster Animal Clinic is based out of Concord, North Carolina.

FAC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FAC

Foster Animal Clinic CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

FAC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FAC

Incidents vs Veterinary Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foster Animal Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foster Animal Clinic in 2026.

Incident Types FAC vs Veterinary Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foster Animal Clinic in 2026.

Incident History - FAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Foster Animal Clinic Subsidiaries

FAC

Veterinary

Website: http://www.fosteranimalhospital.com

Company Size: 1

Southern Veterinary PartnersVeterinary Services

Crossroads Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Cornerstone Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Dog & Cat HospitalVeterinary Services

Wilmington Animal Healthcare Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Heartland Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Sunset Canyon Veterinary ClinicVeterinary Services

Acredale Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Wellesley Animal HospitalVeterinary

Shores Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Southport Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Suburban Animal Hospital FloridaVeterinary Services

Friendship Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITALVeterinary Services

The Ark Animal Hospital - AtlantaVeterinary

Gateway Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Patton Chapel Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Gwinnett Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Goodwin Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Valleydale Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Fullerton Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Appalachian Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Abadie Veterinary Hospital LLCVeterinary Services

Northwind Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Hillside Animal Clinic - IndianaVeterinary Services

Four Paws InnVeterinary

Firetower Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Britt Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Avondale Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Lynn Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Blairsville Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Noah's Ark Veterinary Hospital of Preston P.A.Veterinary Services

West Kendall Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Mobley Veterinary ClinicVeterinary Services

Hurstbourne Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Horn Lake Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Juno Beach Animal HospitalVeterinary

Powhatan Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Murrayville Veterinary ClinicVeterinary

Legacy Drive Animal HospitalVeterinary

Chimney Lakes Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Hickory Veterinary Hospital, L.L.C.Veterinary Services

Lyndon Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

KENTLANDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL, PCVeterinary

North Texas Emergency Pet Clinic CarrolltonVeterinary

Cibolo Creek Veterianry HospitalVeterinary Services

Tyrone Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Casa Linda Animal ClinicVeterinary

Helena Veterinary ClinicVeterinary

Reisterstown Pet Resort & SpaVeterinary Services

Signal Hill Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Tri City East Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Dodd Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Animal Hospital of Pitt CountyVeterinary Services

Main Street Veterinary Hospital - MarylandVeterinary Services

Cornelia Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Animal Medical Center VAVeterinary Services

Keller Animal ClinicVeterinary

Southwood Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Herschel Animal ClinicVeterinary

North Greenville Animal HospitalVeterinary

Avery Ranch Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Woodruff Road Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Cypress Square Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Melton Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Standifer's Animal ClinicVeterinary

Sun Valley Animal Hospital - North CarolinaVeterinary Services

Village Way Veterinary HospVeterinary

Stewart Animal ClinicVeterinary Services

Clarkesville Veterinary HospitalVeterinary Services

Hoegemeyer Animal ClinicVeterinary

Walker Animal HospitalVeterinary

Golden Triangle Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

St. Bernard’s Animal HospitalVeterinary Services

Loading…

Foster Animal Clinic Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Foster Animal Clinic CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 24, 2025 08:00 AM

SVAS adds new role as city pound

Souris Valley Animal Shelter experienced a significant transition this year when it took on a new role as animal pound for the City of Minot.

Read Article

July 14, 2023 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity in veterinary medicine

When typical veterinary professionals think about cybersecurity, it is common for them to assume that they are not a target to cyber criminals.

Read Article

May 12, 2023 07:00 AM

Desperately needed home for a cat and her three kittens, in Dubai

It was late at night and Belinda, a heavily pregnant homeless cat, was brought to a vet in Dubai by a resident. The next day she delivered...

Read Article

April 20, 2017 07:00 AM

Patient facilities, student learning both enhanced with renovation of animal hospital at Cummings Veterinary Medical Center at Tufts University

A $10 million renovation of the Henry and Lois Foster Hospital for Small Animals at Cummings Veterinary Medical Center at Tufts University is complete.

Read Article

April 29, 2015 07:00 AM

Foster Hospital for Small Animals renovation begins

NORTH GRAFTON, Mass. (April 29, 2015)—The commitment of Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University donors has made the new...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…