Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fortune Brands InnovationsFortune Brands Innovations
VS
UnileverUnilever
Fortune Brands Innovations

Fortune Brands Innovations

1 Horizon Way, Deerfield, Illinois, US, 60015

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://http://www.fbin.com
687/1000Weak

Fortune Brands Innovations is an industry-leading home, security and digital products company. Our driving purpose is to Elevate Every Life by Transforming Spaces into Havens. We’re advancing exciting innovations across our portfolio, which includes: Moen, House of ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:2,518
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Unilever

Unilever

100 Victoria Embankment, Blackfriars, London, GB, EC4Y 0DY

Last Update: 31/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unilever.com
786/1000Fair

Every day, 3.4 billion people around the world enjoy our products - from ground-breaking brands like Hellmann's, Domestos, Dove and Rexona (to name just a few). Our brands lead the way - innovating in their fields, delighting their consumers and powering our business fo...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:130,813
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fortune Brands Innovations

Fortune Brands Innovations

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Unilever

Unilever

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Fortune Brands Innovations has 66.22% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unilever in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fortune Brands Innovations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortune Brands Innovations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Unilever (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unilever cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fortune Brands Innovations

Fortune Brands Innovations

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MOEFOR1769569433
Unilever

Unilever

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNIMICASTFLORHO1772483656

FAQ

Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations company and Unilever company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations and Unilever, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations and Unilever, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fortune Brands Innovations or Unilever ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fortune Brands Innovations or Unilever ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations and Unilever, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fortune Brands Innovations and Unilever, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-14683
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in HdrHistogram up to 2.2.2. Affected by this issue is the function org.HdrHistogram.AbstractHistogram.decodeFromCompressedByteBuffer of the file src/main/java/org/HdrHistogram/AbstractHistogram.java. The manipulation of the argument lengthOfCompressedContents results in uncontrolled memory allocation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-14660
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Job Portal 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file login.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument txtUser/txtPass results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-14659
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /patientappointment.php. Such manipulation of the argument patiente leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14658
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php. The manipulation of the argument smarksrange[] results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14657
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Assessment Management 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /lecturer/marking-scheme.php of the component Database Query Handler. This manipulation of the argument squestions[] causes sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-04
UPDATED
Date2026-07-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8