What is the official website of Fort Worth Star-Telegram ?

The official website of Fort Worth Star-Telegram is http://www.star-telegram.com.

What is Fort Worth Star-Telegram's cybersecurity risk score?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 754 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Fort Worth Star-Telegram experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Fort Worth Star-Telegram been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Fort Worth Star-Telegram is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Fort Worth Star-Telegram is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Fort Worth Star-Telegram operate in ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram operates primarily in the Newspaper Publishing industry.

How many employees does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram employs approximately 413 people worldwide.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram own any subsidiaries ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 4,669 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Fort Worth Star-Telegram ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram is classified under the NAICS code 51111, which corresponds to Newspaper Publishers.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Fort Worth Star-Telegram does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Fort Worth Star-Telegram maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fort-worth-star-telegram.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Fort Worth Star-Telegram experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Fort Worth Star-Telegram has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Fort Worth Star-Telegram have ?

Fort Worth Star-Telegram has an estimated 2,132 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Fort Worth Star-Telegram faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FWS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

754

/1000

Fair

779

/1000

Fair

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

star-telegram.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Fort Worth Star was founded in 1906 and merged with the Fort Worth Telegram in 1909 to become the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. McClatchy acquired the newspaper in 2006 with its acquisition of Knight Ridder. The newspaper bears a rich and colorful legacy tied to the Old West. Its founding publisher, Amon G. Carter Sr., was a renowned booster of Fort Worth and West Texas

FWS

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

The Sacramento Bee

Ransomware

100

5/2026

THECHATHE177826...

Fort Worth Star-Tel...

Ransomware

100

02/2018

THE12346622

McClatchy Media

Breach

6/2001

CHAPOSTHERR-176...

Loading…

A.I.

FWS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FWS

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Worth Star-Telegram in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Worth Star-Telegram in 2026.

Incident Types FWS vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Worth Star-Telegram in 2026.

Incident History - FWS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Subsidiaries

FWS

Newspaper Publishing

Website: http://www.star-telegram.com

Company Size: 413

McClatchy MediaNewspaper Publishing

Miami HeraldNewspaper Publishing

The Charlotte ObserverNewspaper Publishing

The Wichita EagleNewspaper Publishing

The Sacramento BeeNewspaper Publishing

The Kansas City StarNewspaper Publishing

The News & Observer Publishing CompanyNewspaper Publishing

Idaho StatesmanNewspaper Publishing

Together Treasure ValleyPhilanthropy

McClatchy AdvertisingAdvertising Services

The Fresno BeeNewspaper Publishing

The Seymour TribuneNewspaper Publishing

The News TribuneNewspaper Publishing

Lexington Herald-LeaderNewspaper Publishing

Bradenton HeraldNewspaper Publishing

The HeraldNewspaper Publishing

The Modesto BeeNewspaper Publishing

The Bellingham HeraldNewspaper Publishing

The Sun NewsNewspaper Publishing

Belleville News-DemocratNewspaper Publishing

The Peninsula GatewayNewspaper Publishing

Merced Sun-StarNewspaper Publishing

The San Luis Obispo Tribune newspaperNewspaper Publishing

Centre Daily TimesNewspaper Publishing

Sun HeraldBook and Periodical Publishing

Loading…

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Similar Companies

The Wall Street Journal

cb wsj.com

Winner of 40 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, The Wall Street Journal includes coverage of U.S. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. It's a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, interactive features, video, online columns and blogs. Since 1889, readers have trusted the Journal for accurate, objective information to fuel their decisions as well as enlighten, educate and inspire them. On LinkedIn, we will share articles to help you navigate your career, including stories from our business, management, leisure and technology sections. Subscribe: http://on.wsj.com/1n1uvCH Job opportunities: http://www.dowjones.com/careers

Nikkei

nikkei.co.jp

Nikkei is a world-renowned media brand for Asian news, respected for quality journalism and for being a trusted provider of business news and information. Founded as a market news provider in Japan in 1876, Nikkei has grown into one of the world’s largest media corporations, with 37 foreign editorial bureaus and approximately 1,500 journalists worldwide. Nikkei acquired the Financial Times in 2015. Combined digital and print readership of the Nikkei and the FT totals about 4 million.

Loading…

NEWS

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 26, 2026 06:21 PM

Are online banks safe? 6 security tips for banking online

Are online banks safe? Short answer: yes. Online banks take numerous precautions every day to keep your money safe, from advanced...

Read Article

February 14, 2026 08:00 AM

Here are the Democratic candidates for Texas General Land Office commissioner

Here's how the candidates responded to Star-Telegram questions about why they deserve your vote in the March 3 primary.

Read Article

February 11, 2026 08:00 AM

Intrusion Inc. Launches the P.O.S.S.E. Program, Expanding the Deployment of Shield Technology

February 11, 2026 / Intrusion Inc. (NASDAQ:INTZ) ("Intrusion" or the "Company"), a leader in cyberattack prevention solutions,...

Read Article

January 22, 2026 08:00 AM

Kraken Isn't the SMX Infrastructure Finish Line, It's a Required Layer

January 22, 2026 / SMX's (NASDAQ:SMX) announcement around Kraken explained what the move adds to the SMX platform. It's just as important to...

Read Article

January 08, 2026 08:00 AM

Bridgehead Earns ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification, Strengthening Global Information Security Standards

Internationally recognized certification validates Bridgehead's commitment to data protection, risk management, and compliance excellence.

Read Article

December 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Trust Consulting Services Named Awardee on Missile Defense Agency SHIELD IDIQ Contract Valued at Approximately $2.3 Billion

December 23, 2025 / Trust Consulting Services, a rapidly growing professional services and technology firm, today announced that it has been...

Read Article

December 01, 2025 08:00 AM

AmeriLife Names Sulabh Srivastava Chief Information Officer

Newly created role to accelerate AmeriLife's digital transformation and enhance technology integration across the company's expansive...

Read Article

November 24, 2025 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity threats and data breaches

In an ever-evolving landscape of changing technological advances and increasingly sophisticated cybercrime practices, individuals and...

Read Article

October 04, 2025 07:00 AM

New to The Street to Broadcast Nationwide on Bloomberg Tonight at 6:30 PM EST

Sponsored Programming Featuring Commercials by Laser Photonics Corp. (NASDAQ:LASE), Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACXP),...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

FWS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News & History

FWS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for FWS

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types FWS vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - FWS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Subsidiaries

FWS

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Similar Companies

The Wall Street Journal

Nikkei

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News

Are online banks safe? 6 security tips for banking online

Here are the Democratic candidates for Texas General Land Office commissioner

Intrusion Inc. Launches the P.O.S.S.E. Program, Expanding the Deployment of Shield Technology

Kraken Isn't the SMX Infrastructure Finish Line, It's a Required Layer

Bridgehead Earns ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification, Strengthening Global Information Security Standards

Trust Consulting Services Named Awardee on Missile Defense Agency SHIELD IDIQ Contract Valued at Approximately $2.3 Billion

AmeriLife Names Sulabh Srivastava Chief Information Officer

Cybersecurity threats and data breaches

New to The Street to Broadcast Nationwide on Bloomberg Tonight at 6:30 PM EST

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News & History

FWS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for FWS

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types FWS vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - FWS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Subsidiaries

FWS

Fort Worth Star-Telegram Similar Companies

The Wall Street Journal

Nikkei

Fort Worth Star-Telegram CyberSecurity News

Are online banks safe? 6 security tips for banking online

Here are the Democratic candidates for Texas General Land Office commissioner

Intrusion Inc. Launches the P.O.S.S.E. Program, Expanding the Deployment of Shield Technology

Kraken Isn't the SMX Infrastructure Finish Line, It's a Required Layer

Bridgehead Earns ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification, Strengthening Global Information Security Standards

Trust Consulting Services Named Awardee on Missile Defense Agency SHIELD IDIQ Contract Valued at Approximately $2.3 Billion

AmeriLife Names Sulabh Srivastava Chief Information Officer

Cybersecurity threats and data breaches

New to The Street to Broadcast Nationwide on Bloomberg Tonight at 6:30 PM EST

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo