Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Foot LockerFoot Locker
VS
Boxer SuperstoresBoxer Superstores
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

330 West 34th Street, New York City, New York, US, 10001

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
793/1000Fair

Foot Locker, Inc. is a leading footwear and apparel retailer that unlocks the “inner sneakerhead” in all of us. With approximately 2,500 retail stores in 26 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, and a franchised store presence in the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,990
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Boxer Superstores

Boxer Superstores

41 The Boulevard, Westville, 3610, ZA

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://boxerinvestor.co.za/
795/1000Fair

Boxer Superstores is one of Southern Africa’s fastest-growing discount supermarket chains, driven by a strong commitment to affordability, accessibility, and community. With operations across every province in South Africa and into the Kingdom of eSwatini, Boxer stands ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,313
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Boxer Superstores

Boxer Superstores

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foot Locker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boxer Superstores in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Foot Locker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foot Locker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Boxer Superstores (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boxer Superstores cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Boxer Superstores

Boxer Superstores

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Foot Locker company and Boxer Superstores company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Foot Locker and Boxer Superstores, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Foot Locker and Boxer Superstores, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Foot Locker or Boxer Superstores ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Foot Locker or Boxer Superstores ?
Between Foot Locker and Boxer Superstores, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Foot Locker and Boxer Superstores, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8