What is the official website of FoodMinds ?

The official website of FoodMinds is http://www.foodminds.com.

What is FoodMinds's cybersecurity risk score?

FoodMinds has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 750 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has FoodMinds experienced?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has FoodMinds been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does FoodMinds have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does FoodMinds have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does FoodMinds comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does FoodMinds have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does FoodMinds comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, FoodMinds is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does FoodMinds have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,FoodMinds is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does FoodMinds operate in ?

FoodMinds operates primarily in the Public Relations and Communications Services industry.

How many employees does FoodMinds have ?

FoodMinds employs approximately 39 people worldwide.

Does FoodMinds own any subsidiaries ?

FoodMinds presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does FoodMinds have ?

FoodMinds's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 10,157 followers.

Does FoodMinds have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, FoodMinds does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does FoodMinds have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, FoodMinds maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/foodminds-llc.

How many cybersecurity incidents has FoodMinds experienced ?

As of July 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that FoodMinds has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does FoodMinds have ?

FoodMinds has an estimated 4,616 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FoodMinds

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

750

/1000

Fair

775

/1000

Fair

FoodMinds Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

foodminds.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

FoodMinds, a division of Padilla, is an award-winning food and nutrition communications and consulting company boldly transforming the way the world thinks about food, nutrition and health. We are creating a new frontier where people are healthier and happier. FoodMinds is a destination where talented professionals who are passionate about food and nutrition have come together to leverage our insights and produce meaningful results for our clients and for public health. We are not just another PR agency. We have global reach. We change minds. We help our clients tell a better story. Founded in 2006, FoodMinds is proud that our work has been recognized by industry leaders. We were named the Holmes Report’s 2013 Boutique Agency of the

FoodMinds A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FoodMinds

FoodMinds CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

FoodMinds Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FoodMinds

Incidents vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FoodMinds in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FoodMinds in 2026.

Incident Types FoodMinds vs Public Relations and Communications Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FoodMinds in 2026.

Incident History - FoodMinds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

FoodMinds Subsidiaries

Parent Company

FoodMinds

Public Relations and Communications Services

Website: http://www.foodminds.com

Company Size: 39

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

FoodMinds Similar Companies

International Mission of Mercy (IMM)

immusa.org

International Mission of Mercy (IMM) was founded in 1991 by Satish Mehtani, a veteran of disaster relief missions in Kuwait, Japan and at the World Trade Center following September 11, 2001. IMM is a certified 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose goals are to serve people of all cultures following natural or man-made disasters, including weather-related catastrophes and violent uprisings. Mr. Mehtani and his wife Sneh are honored and proud to live in freedom in the United States. To pay tribute to their good luck, they have pledged a portion of their resources from Mehtani Restaurant Group, a 30-year-old, national portfolio of seven fine-dining Indian, Pan-Asian and Italian restaurants, and an award-winning catered events business, to rebuild communities and care for affected populations around the world. The professional team committed to IMM includes renowned physicians in the fields of pediatrics, geriatrics, orthopedics, infectious disease, ophthalmology, pain management, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, psychology, physical therapy, nuclear medicine and more. Also on the distinguished Board of Directors is a former U.S. Ambassador, a retired Major General USA, attorneys, the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce CEO and respected leaders in the community. IMM provides satellite feeding centers capable of serving up to 10,000 people per day, using foods and designing recipes common to the culture of the region.

Loading…

NEWS

FoodMinds CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-12484

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.15.0 allows unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled PyTorch pickle data through the public `keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config` method. This method invokes `torch.load(..., weights_only=False)` without requiring an explicit unsafe opt-in, such as a `safe_mode=False` parameter. When called outside a `SafeModeScope(True)` context, the absence of an ambient safe mode state permits unsafe deserialization by default. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if untrusted Keras layer configurations are processed using this method. The vulnerability arises because the method does not enforce safe deserialization practices unless explicitly guarded by Keras safe mode.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://huntr.com/bounties/ab14df49-13b5-4442-b754-3189430bfa28

CVE-2026-64186

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/amd: Remove latent out-of-bounds access in IOMMU debugfs In iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write(), the variables dbg_mmio_offset and dbg_cap_offset are declared as int. However, they are populated using kstrtou32_from_user(). If a user provides a sufficiently large value, it can become a negative integer. Prior to this patch, the AMD IOMMU debugfs implementation was already protected by different mechanisms. 1. #define OFS_IN_SZ 8 ensures the user string <= 8 bytes, so e.g. 0xffffffff isn't a valid input. if (cnt > OFS_IN_SZ) return -EINVAL; 2. Implicit type promotion in iommu_mmio_write(), dbg_mmio_offset is int and iommu->mmio_phys_end is u64 if (dbg_mmio_offset > iommu->mmio_phys_end - sizeof(u64)) return -EINVAL; 3. The show handlers would currently catch the negative number and refuse to perform the read. Replace kstrtou32_from_user() with kstrtos32_from_user() to parse the input, and check for negative values to explicitly prevent out-of-bounds memory accesses directly in iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write().

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64185

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: don't remove existing directory on update failure When sysfs_update_group() is called for a named group and create_files() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM), internal_create_group() calls kernfs_remove(kn) on the group directory. In the update path, kn was obtained via kernfs_find_and_get() and refers to a directory that already existed before this call. Removing it silently destroys a sysfs group that the caller did not create. Only remove the directory if we created it ourselves. On update failure the directory remains as it is left empty by remove_files() inside create_files(), but can be repopulated by a retry.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64184

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: call missing mem_cgroup_iter_break() damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() breaks mem_cgroup_iter() loop without calling mem_cgroup_iter_break(). This leaks the cgroup reference. Fix the issue by calling mem_cgroup_iter_break() before the break. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64183

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…