Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Fnac Darty » FNA1770832351

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FNA1770832351)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-90
Company Score Before Incident772 / 1000
Company Score After Incident682 / 1000
Company LinkView Fnac Darty Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFNA1770832351
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to third-party provider
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal data (names, postal addresses,...
INCIDENT DATE10/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Fnac Darty's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Fnac Darty Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fnac Darty breach identified under incident ID FNA1770832351.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fnac Darty's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fnac-darty, the number of followers: 59895, the industry type: Retail and the number of employees: 20737 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 772 and after the incident was 682 with a difference of -90 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fnac Darty and their customers.

On 11 February 2024, Darty disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Fnac-Darty Data Breach Affecting 80,000 Darty Customers".

Fnac-Darty disclosed a cyberattack on February 11, revealing that approximately 80,000 Darty customers had their personal data compromised.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Online kitchen design tools, third-party data hosting provider, and exposing Personal data (names, postal addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, home/project details), with nearly 80,000 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, customer notification.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Customers notified of potential phishing risks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to data hosted by a third-party provider. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to third-party provider suggests possible token abuse. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal data...compromised via third-party providers systems and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data submitted during appointment scheduling was exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting approximately 80,000 customers and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party provider data access suggests possible cloud exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential for phishing campaigns using compromised data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (90%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References