Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust » FLY1770839727

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FLY1770839727)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-154
Company Score Before Incident601 / 1000
Company Score After Incident447 / 1000
Company LinkView Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFLY1770839727
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE10/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust breach identified under incident ID FLY1770839727.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/flytulsa, the number of followers: 1671, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 79 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 601 and after the incident was 447 with a difference of -154 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust and their customers.

On 11 February 2026, Tulsa International Airport (TIA) disclosed ransomware issues under the banner "Tulsa International Airport Hit by Ransomware Attack".

On February 11, 2026, Tulsa International Airport (TIA) disclosed it had fallen victim to a ransomware attack.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Taken, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement issued.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected; attack vector not disclosed and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating airport systems targeted; no disruption to operations. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disclosed; likely user interaction. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack; no details on strain or encryption and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating containment measures taken; investigation ongoing. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disclosed; no disruption to operations. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack; data exfiltration not confirmed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)

Sources & References