Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FLSFLS
VS
AngloGold AshantiAngloGold Ashanti
FLS

FLS

Vigerslev Allé 77, Valby, 2500, DK

Last Update: 28/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fls.com/
754/1000Fair

FLS is a leading, full flowsheet minerals processing supplier to the global mining industry. We deliver mining equipment and services across the lifecycle of operations, and have set targets of providing solutions for zero-emissions mining by 2030 with our MissionZero p...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Greenwood Village, Denver, 80111, US

Last Update: 15/06/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

AngloGold Ashanti plc is a global gold mining company with a diverse, high-quality portfolio of operations, projects and exploration activities across 10 countries on four continents. We pursue value-creating opportunities involving other minerals, where we can leverage...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:12,992
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FLS

FLS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AngloGold Ashanti in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AngloGold Ashanti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AngloGold Ashanti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FLS

FLS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FLS company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FLS and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FLS and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FLS or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FLS or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Between FLS and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FLS and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9