Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Florida Physician Specialists, LLC » FLO1777311482

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FLO1777311482)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident764 / 1000
Company Score After Incident700 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFLO1777311482
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and medical data,...
INCIDENT DATE26/11/2025
STATUSConcluded

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Florida Physician Specialists, LLC's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Florida Physician Specialists, LLC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Florida Physician Specialists, LLC breach identified under incident ID FLO1777311482.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Florida Physician Specialists, LLC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/florida-physician-specialists-llc, the number of followers: 38, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 8 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 764 and after the incident was 700 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Florida Physician Specialists, LLC and their customers.

On 24 April 2026, Florida Physician Specialists LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Florida Physician Specialists Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

Florida Physician Specialists LLC disclosed a data breach involving unauthorized access to its network, exposing sensitive personal and medical data of patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Network, and exposing Sensitive personal and medical data, including full names, Social Security numbers, driver’s license and government ID numbers, financial account and payment card details, medical and health insurance information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Concluded, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notifications sent to affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its network between November 27 and 29, 2025 and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving unauthorized access to its network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of Social Security numbers, financial account details and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal and medical data compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating full names, SSNs, medical/health insurance info exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating multi-specialty medical practice with patient records accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach with sensitive info exposed; total under determination and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to network; data exfiltration implied. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access; no explicit mention of destruction and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk; potential data tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References