Comparison Overview

Flock Safety

VS

TÜV Rheinland Group

Flock Safety

None, None, Atlanta, Georgia, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 650 and 699

We are the first public safety operating system empowering thousands of cities to eliminate crime. Our cameras and devices detect objective evidence, decode it with machine learning, and deliver it into the hands that stop crime.

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 1,304
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

TÜV Rheinland Group

Am Grauen Stein, None, Cologne, None, DE, 51105
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and certify products, plants, processes and management systems as well as services based on legal requirements and other relevant performance benchmarks and standards. In addition, TÜV Rheinland qualifies specialists and trains people for numerous companies and areas of business and life. Using knowledge meaningfully Our greatest capital is based on over 20,000 clever minds: concentrated knowledge. It is our enormous pool of experience from which the people at TÜV Rheinland create exceptional substance and inspiration for their meaningful work. The results of their work can be discovered everywhere: in tested elevators or rides, on certified toys or technical equipment, in our advice or training. No matter where - our international teams have been setting standards in terms of safety, quality and efficiency for many years.

NAICS: 92219
NAICS Definition: Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees: 16,951
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flock-safety.jpeg
Flock Safety
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuv-rheinland-group.jpeg
TÜV Rheinland Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flock Safety
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TÜV Rheinland Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

Flock Safety has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2025.

Incident History — Flock Safety (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flock Safety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TÜV Rheinland Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flock-safety.jpeg
Flock Safety
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Unintentional (operational oversight in pilot programs for combating human trafficking and fentanyl distribution)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuv-rheinland-group.jpeg
TÜV Rheinland Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TÜV Rheinland Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flock Safety company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Flock Safety company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TÜV Rheinland Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Flock Safety company has reported more cyber incidents than TÜV Rheinland Group company.

Neither TÜV Rheinland Group company nor Flock Safety company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Flock Safety company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other TÜV Rheinland Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Flock Safety company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while TÜV Rheinland Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Flock Safety company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while TÜV Rheinland Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TÜV Rheinland Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Flock Safety company.

TÜV Rheinland Group company employs more people globally than Flock Safety company, reflecting its scale as a Public Safety.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flock Safety nor TÜV Rheinland Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X