What is the official website of Flint Group Polska ?

The official website of Flint Group Polska is https://www.flintgrp.com/lp-pl/.

What is Flint Group Polska's cybersecurity risk score?

Flint Group Polska has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 756 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Flint Group Polska experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Flint Group Polska been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Flint Group Polska have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Flint Group Polska have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Flint Group Polska comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Flint Group Polska have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Flint Group Polska comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Flint Group Polska is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Flint Group Polska have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Flint Group Polska is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Flint Group Polska operate in ?

Flint Group Polska operates primarily in the Usługi drukarskie industry.

How many employees does Flint Group Polska have ?

Flint Group Polska employs approximately 0 people worldwide.

Does Flint Group Polska own any subsidiaries ?

Flint Group Polska presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Flint Group Polska have ?

Flint Group Polska's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,265 followers.

Does Flint Group Polska have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Flint Group Polska does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Flint Group Polska have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Flint Group Polska maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/flint-group-polska.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Flint Group Polska experienced ?

As of August 16, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Flint Group Polska has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Flint Group Polska have ?

Flint Group Polska has an estimated 0 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FGP

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

756

/1000

Fair

781

/1000

Fair

Flint Group Polska Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

flintgrp.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Jesteśmy wiodącym dostawcą przemysłu poligraficznego i opakowaniowego na świecie. Nasze farby używane są do druku opakowań największych i najbardziej rozpoznawalnych marek konsumenckich. Oznacza to, że masz kontakt z efektami naszej pracy codziennie – np. kiedy robisz zakupy albo zamawiasz kawę. Chcemy być niezawodnym partnerem w branży poligraficznej i opakowań. Nieustannie inwestujemy w rozwój i innowacje, a podstawą wszystkich naszych działań jest troska o bezpieczeństwo i najwyższe standardy etyczne. Takie podejście pomogło nam zdobyć zaufanie klientów i pracowników. Zatrudniamy około 6,5 tys. pracowników w 140 lokalizacjach w 40 krajach. Od 1999 roku działamy w Polsce, gdzie zatrudniamy ponad 450 osób. Na całym świecie obsługujemy

FGP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FGP

Flint Group Polska CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

FGP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FGP

Incidents vs Usługi drukarskie Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flint Group Polska in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flint Group Polska in 2026.

Incident Types FGP vs Usługi drukarskie Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flint Group Polska in 2026.

Incident History - FGP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Flint Group Polska Subsidiaries

FGP

Usługi drukarskie

Website: https://www.flintgrp.com/lp-pl/

Company Size: 0

Flint GroupPrinting Services

Loading…

Flint Group Polska Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Flint Group Polska CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-19917

SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in code-projects Online Food Order System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file delete_food_items1.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument checkbox can lead to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-74767

SUMMARY

Pandora contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in its handling of DAA (Direct Access Archive) files. When extracting the internal ISO image from a DAA archive, compressed chunks were decompressed using zlib.decompress() without enforcing a limit on the resulting uncompressed data. An attacker able to submit a crafted DAA file containing highly compressed data could cause Pandora to decompress a relatively small input into a very large amount of data in memory. Because the decompressed chunks are accumulated to construct the internal ISO image, this could result in excessive memory consumption and potentially CPU exhaustion, causing the extraction worker to become unresponsive, terminate, or affect the availability of the Pandora service. The patch introduces bounded decompression using decompressobj().decompress() with max_extracted_filesize, verifies the cumulative size of decompressed chunks, and raises a dedicated ZipBomb exception when the configured limit is exceeded. Pandora then aborts extraction and reports the file as too large.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/pandora-analysis/pandora/commit/f4294a873f86fbf2569c289e329fff2f52ca50c9

CVE-2026-74764

SUMMARY

Pandora contains a path traversal vulnerability in its TAR archive extraction functionality. When processing a submitted TAR archive, the extractor passed archive member names directly to Python's tarfile.TarFile.extract() without applying an extraction filter. An attacker able to submit a specially crafted TAR archive containing malicious member paths, such as paths using ../ sequences or absolute paths, could cause extracted files to be written outside the intended extraction directory. This may allow the attacker to overwrite files accessible to the Pandora worker process and could potentially result in application compromise, arbitrary code execution, or denial of service depending on the files targeted and the privileges of the Pandora process. The vulnerability is corrected by using Python's filter='data' extraction filter, which rejects or sanitizes dangerous TAR members, including paths that escape the destination directory and unsafe link targets. The weakness corresponds to MITRE's general path traversal category, which includes archive extraction cases where attacker-controlled filenames cause files to be written outside the intended directory.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/pandora-analysis/pandora/commit/186b58d41e04248a154d274fffb5813e7fa2012e

CVE-2026-73055

SUMMARY

Shescape before 2.1.15 (and 3.0.0 before 3.0.2) fails to properly escape tilde (~) characters in assignment contexts on Unix systems where the shell is explicitly configured to "sh" or true and /bin/sh points to BusyBox. Using the escape and escapeAll APIs with untrusted input in an assignment prefixed to a command, an attacker can inject a tilde payload to disclose the user's home directory location and, depending on usage, alter the location on which a command operates.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-73054

SUMMARY

SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the WebSocket endpoint caused by differential parsing of query parameters between authentication exemption and session quarantine checks. Unauthenticated attackers can craft a malicious WebSocket URI with duplicated query parameters to bypass access auth code validation and receive the live kernel event stream including document identifiers, titles, and operation logs.

Published

Date2026-08-15

Updated

Date2026-08-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…