Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FLANNELSFLANNELS
VS
The TJX Companies, Inc.The TJX Companies, Inc.
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

36 Poland Street, London, W1F 7LU, GB

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile

FLANNELS is one of the UK’s leading luxury retailers, specialising in contemporary men’s, women’s and kids designer clothing, footwear and accessories. The first store was opened in Knutsford, Cheshire in 1976. Since then, we have been nurturing our combined offering o...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,269
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, 01701, US

Last Update: 29/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.tjx.com/
846/1000Good

TJX is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the U.S. and worldwide, with four global home offices, seven brands, nearly 4,700 stores in nine countries, and five distinctive branded e-commerce sites. As Associates, we make a difference with our con...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:54,102
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLANNELS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The TJX Companies, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FLANNELS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLANNELS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The TJX Companies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The TJX Companies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FLANNELS company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FLANNELS and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FLANNELS and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FLANNELS or The TJX Companies, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FLANNELS or The TJX Companies, Inc. ?
Between FLANNELS and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FLANNELS and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9754
SUMMARY

An authenticated user with the read role may read limited amounts of uninitialized stack memory via specially-crafted issuances of the filemd5 command

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9753
SUMMARY

The $_internalApplyOplogUpdate aggregation pipeline stage can be used to execute a document diff containing a malformed binary diff to return memory out-of-bounds or crash the server. $_internalApplyOplogUpdate can be executed by any authenticated user with access to the aggregate command.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9752
SUMMARY

An authorized user could trigger a server crash by running a query with a 2dsphere index on a field that stores a GeoJSON GeometryCollection containing a Polygon with a strict-winding CRS. Strict-winding polygons are intentionally unsupported for indexing, but the guard that rejects them does not inspect members of a GeometryCollection, allowing the unsafe path to be reached which ends with an ensuing null-pointer dereference.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-9751
SUMMARY

The ldapQueryPassword parameter, when set through the runtime setParameter command, will log the new password to the mongod.log file in plain text.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-9750
SUMMARY

An authenticated user can cause a MongoDB server to crash or return incorrect results by creating documents that interfere with internal metadata processing during query execution. This stems from insufficient separation between user-controlled document fields and internal metadata in certain execution paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-09
UPDATED
Date2026-06-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8