Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FLANNELSFLANNELS
VS
Kmart Australia LimitedKmart Australia Limited
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

36 Poland Street, London, W1F 7LU, GB

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile

FLANNELS is one of the UK’s leading luxury retailers, specialising in contemporary men’s, women’s and kids designer clothing, footwear and accessories. The first store was opened in Knutsford, Cheshire in 1976. Since then, we have been nurturing our combined offering o...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,269
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kmart Australia Limited

Kmart Australia Limited

690 Springvale Road, MULGRAVE, VIC, AU, 3170

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

We’re Team Kmart, on a mission to make everyday living brighter for our customers by improving the Kmart shopping experience – every time and everywhere they engage with us. For over fifty years now, we’ve been spreading the Kmart love to families of all shapes and si...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,552
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kmart Australia Limited

Kmart Australia Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLANNELS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kmart Australia Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FLANNELS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLANNELS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kmart Australia Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kmart Australia Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FLANNELS

FLANNELS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kmart Australia Limited

Kmart Australia Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FLANNELS company and Kmart Australia Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FLANNELS and Kmart Australia Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FLANNELS and Kmart Australia Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FLANNELS or Kmart Australia Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FLANNELS or Kmart Australia Limited ?
Between FLANNELS and Kmart Australia Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FLANNELS and Kmart Australia Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1