Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FIVCLO1776270341)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Fiverr's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Fiverr Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fiverr breach identified under incident ID FIVCLO1776270341.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fiverr's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fiverr-com, the number of followers: 33000, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 221818 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 748 with a difference of -3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fiverr and their customers.
Fiverr recently reported "Fiverr Denies Data Leak After Sensitive User Documents Found Exposed", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Freelance marketplace Fiverr has refuted claims of a data breach following reports that sensitive user documents were publicly accessible via an exposed Cloudinary storage instance.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cloudinary storage instance, and exposing Sensitive user documents (invoices, tax forms, driver’s licenses, credentials, PII).
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Removal requests addressed promptly (per Fiverr's statement), and stakeholders are being briefed through Public denial of data breach; statement emphasizing user consent for uploads.
The case underscores how Ongoing (denial by Fiverr; no confirmation from Cloudinary), and recommending next steps like Use secured, expiring links for client-worker communications instead of public URLs; implement stricter access controls for cloud storage instances.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including exposed Cloudinary storage instance, and public URLs for client-worker communications and Compromise Infrastructure: Cloud Storage (T1584.006) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including misconfigured Cloudinary storage instance, and files indexed by Google. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including credentials found in exposed documents, and sensitive user documents (invoices, tax forms). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage Object (T1213.003) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exposed Cloudinary instance contained invoices, tax forms, PII, and files indexed by Google and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive user documents were publicly accessible. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including files were discoverable through search results, and users shared links to compromised files and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating files indexed by Google, making them discoverable. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential reputational damage due to exposure of sensitive data and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive user documents were publicly accessible. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Fiverr Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fiverr-com/incident/FIVCLO1776270341
- Fiverr CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fiverr-com
- Fiverr Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/fivclo1776270341-cloudinary-fiverr-vulnerability-april-2026/
- Fiverr CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/fiverr-com/history
- Fiverr CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.pymnts.com/cybersecurity/2026/fiverr-denies-report-of-data-leak/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf