What is the official website of First Transit ?

The official website of First Transit is https://transdevNA.com/.

What is First Transit's cybersecurity risk score?

First Transit has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 765 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has First Transit experienced?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has First Transit been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does First Transit have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does First Transit have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does First Transit comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does First Transit have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does First Transit comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, First Transit is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does First Transit have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,First Transit is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does First Transit operate in ?

First Transit operates primarily in the Ground Passenger Transportation industry.

How many employees does First Transit have ?

First Transit employs approximately 3,952 people worldwide.

Does First Transit own any subsidiaries ?

First Transit presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does First Transit have ?

First Transit's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 17,998 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for First Transit ?

First Transit is classified under the NAICS code 485, which corresponds to Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation.

Does First Transit have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, First Transit does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does First Transit have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, First Transit maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/first-transit-now-transdev.

How many cybersecurity incidents has First Transit experienced ?

As of August 3, 2026, Rankiteo reports that First Transit has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does First Transit have ?

First Transit has an estimated 162 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

First Transit

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

765

/1000

Fair

790

/1000

Fair

First Transit Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

transdevna.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

First Transit was acquired in 2023 and is now Transdev. www.transdevNA.com Find us on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/company/transdev-north-america

First Transit A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

First Transit

First Transit CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

First Transit Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for First Transit

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Transit in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Transit in 2026.

Incident Types First Transit vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Transit in 2026.

Incident History - First Transit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

First Transit Subsidiaries

First Transit

Ground Passenger Transportation

Website: https://transdevNA.com/

Company Size: 3,952

Transdev North AmericaTruck Transportation

Loading…

First Transit Similar Companies

Lyft

lyft.com

Whether it’s an everyday commute or a journey that changes everything, Lyft is driven by our purpose: to serve and connect. In 2012, Lyft was founded as one of the first ridesharing communities in the United States. Now, millions of drivers have chosen to earn on billions of rides. Lyft offers rideshare, bikes, and scooters all in one app — for a more connected world, with transportation for everyone.

Loading…

NEWS

First Transit CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 03, 2026 08:45 PM

Transit Technologies Appoints Srithal Bellary as Chief Technology, Data & AI Officer to Lead AI-First Platform Transformation

PRNewswire/ -- Transit Technologies, a leading provider of software solutions for modern transit systems, today announced the appointment of...

Read Article

January 26, 2026 08:00 AM

Queen Mary 2 Makes Historic First Transit Through the Panama Canal

Cunard's iconic Queen Mary 2 today completed her historic first transit through the Panama Canal, marking a major milestone in her 2026...

Read Article

December 22, 2025 08:00 AM

Maersk Completes First Red Sea Transit in Nearly Two Years, Considers Gradual Suez Canal Return

A Maersk vessel has navigated the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait for the first time in nearly two years, according to a report from...

Read Article

December 22, 2025 08:00 AM

Maersk completes first Suez Canal transit in two years

Maersk said a vessel transited the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb, first in nearly two years, testing a Suez return.

Read Article

December 17, 2025 08:00 AM

Transportation trends 2025–2026: Modernizing America’s transportation infrastructure

Five key trends shaping the US transportation system, from AI and autonomous vehicles to funding, cybersecurity, and infrastructure...

Read Article

October 24, 2025 07:28 PM

Understanding the Coast Guard’s Cybersecurity Rule

On January 17, 2025, the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) issued its Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System rule, creating the first enforceable fed...

Read Article

October 23, 2025 07:00 AM

Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy Creates First-Of-Its-Kind Council to Make Beautiful Structures that Move You | US Department of Transportation

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy today announced the creation of a first-of-its-kind Beautifying Transportation Infrastructure...

Read Article

October 03, 2025 07:00 AM

Article | Trump targets Chicago transit money in latest shutdown fight salvo

Federal funding for Chicago Transit Authority improvements is the latest target in the Trump administration's pressure campaign on Democrats...

Read Article

September 23, 2025 07:00 AM

Maryland transit services for disabled return, 1 month after cyberattack

Maryland Transit Administration Mobility Link services are back in operations following a cyberattack last month.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18577

SUMMARY

An incomplete patch for CVE-2026-18556 allows for authentication bypass and account takeover in N-central Versions through 2026.3.1

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10848

SUMMARY

The OCPP 1.6 client in subsys/net/lib/ocpp parsed inbound WAMP RPC frames in parse_rpc_msg() (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp_j.c) using a hand-rolled helper, extract_string_field(), that copied the message's uid and action fields with strncpy(out_buf, token + 1, outlen - 1) and then scanned the result with strchr(out_buf, '"'). Because strncpy does not NUL-terminate the destination when the source is at least outlen - 1 (127) bytes long, the subsequent strchr reads past the 128-byte destination buffer into adjacent stack memory; if a " byte is found beyond the buffer, a one-byte out-of-bounds NUL write also occurs. A related defect in extract_payload() runs strchr/strrchr over the receive buffer, which may not be NUL-terminated when a maximal-length frame fills it. The parsed bytes come directly from the OCPP central-system server over a websocket: the reader thread fills recv_buf via websocket_recv_msg() and calls parse_rpc_msg() on each inbound DATA frame (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp.c). A malicious or compromised central server, or an on-path attacker (OCPP is commonly deployed over plain ws://), can send an RPC frame whose uid or action field is 127+ bytes with no closing quote, triggering the out-of-bounds access. The primary impact is a remotely triggerable denial of service: the unbounded scan can fault on an unmapped page, and the stray NUL write can corrupt adjacent stack state. The over-read data is not reflected to the peer, so disclosure is limited. The feature is EXPERIMENTAL and must be explicitly enabled (CONFIG_OCPP). The fix replaces the manual parser with the bounds-respecting json_mixed_arr_parse() and copies the extracted uid with an explicitly NUL-terminated buffer, eliminating both over-reads.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-9856

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in huggingface/transformers versions <=5.8.0.dev0 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary file writes via path traversal. The issue resides in the `save_pretrained()` methods of `PreTrainedTokenizerBase` and `ProcessorMixin`, where keys from the `chat_template` dictionary are used directly as filenames without proper validation. An attacker can exploit this by publishing a malicious Hugging Face Hub repository with a crafted `tokenizer_config.json` file. When a victim downloads and saves the tokenizer or processor, the attacker-controlled keys can escape the intended save directory, enabling arbitrary file writes with attacker-controlled content. This vulnerability affects multiple processors inheriting from `ProcessorMixin`, including Idefics, Florence, Gemma, Phi, and Qwen-VL.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-65321

SUMMARY

PyAthena prior to 3.35.4 contains a sql injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL by exploiting improper quote-escaping in DefaultParameterFormatter.format(), which routes DELETE and CTAS statements to the _escape_hive function that backslash-escapes single quotes rather than doubling them. Because Athena and Trino do not treat backslashes as escape characters inside string literals, attacker-supplied input such as a single quote followed by SQL syntax causes the parser to terminate the string literal prematurely, enabling data exfiltration via UNION SELECT, execution of destructive statements, and attacker-controlled CTAS destination and content.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10774

SUMMARY

Zephyr's Bluetooth Mesh subnet key management leaks one PSA Crypto key slot on every subnet-key teardown. In subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c, net_keys_create() imports the Private Beacon Key into a PSA key slot under CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS (enabled by default), but subnet_keys_destroy() guarded the matching psa_destroy_key() with CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1. That Kconfig symbol was removed when explicit Mesh 1.0.1 support was dropped, so the destroy branch became permanently dead code and the import is never balanced by a destroy. The imbalanced teardown is reached every time subnet keys are destroyed: deleting a subnet (Config Server NetKey Delete), completing a Key Refresh Procedure (which retires the old key set), and resetting/re-provisioning the node. The over-the-air triggers are processed only under the node's device key, so they are exercisable by the provisioner or network administrator that owns the node, reachable over the Bluetooth Mesh network. With the default CONFIG_MBEDTLS_PSA_KEY_SLOT_COUNT of 16, repeated add/delete or key-refresh cycles exhaust the shared PSA key-slot pool after roughly a dozen rounds. Once exhausted, bt_mesh_private_beacon_key() and thus subnet creation fail: the node can no longer add subnets or complete key refresh, and other PSA crypto consumers on the device may be starved, until the device is rebooted. The fix aligns the destroy guard with the import guard (CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS) so each slot is freed.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

0.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…