Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » FireAnt.vn » FIR1781188040

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FIR1781188040)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-16
Company Score Before Incident799 / 1000
Company Score After Incident783 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFIR1781188040
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORSupply-chain compromise, Remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2025
STATUSCompleted (campaign ceased or disrupted)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of FireAnt.vn's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts FireAnt.vn Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the FireAnt.vn breach identified under incident ID FIR1781188040.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of FireAnt.vn's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fireant-vn, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 6 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 799 and after the incident was 783 with a difference of -16 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on FireAnt.vn and their customers.

On 01 October 2025, FireAnt MetaKit disclosed Supply-chain attack and Espionage issues under the banner "OceanLotus APT Executes Precision Supply-Chain Attack Targeting Vietnamese Stock Investors".

The advanced persistent threat (APT) group OceanLotus (APT32) conducted a sophisticated supply-chain compromise of FireAnt MetaKit, a widely used Vietnamese market-data component, deploying its SPECTRALVIPER backdoor to target stock investors.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Market-data components (FireAnt MetaKit) and Infrastructure and transport construction firm systems, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Completed (campaign ceased or disrupted).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including supply-chain compromise of FireAnt MetaKit, and exploited FireAnt’s unencrypted HTTP update mechanism and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating initial access likely exploited RCE vulnerabilities in public SQL servers. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating deployed its SPECTRALVIPER backdoor via legitimate update URL and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating side-loading chain involving DtlCrashCatch.dll (SPECTRALVIPER loader). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating side-loaded via legitimate executables (e.g., Toolbox.exe) and Event Triggered Execution: Image File Execution Options Injection (T1546.012) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating injected into OneDrive.Sync.Service.exe. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating dtlCrashCatch.dll (SPECTRALVIPER loader) alongside legitimately signed executable. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including heavily obfuscated downloaders, and encrypted host data embedded in HTTP cookie headers, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating renamed, legitimately signed executable (IntelAudioService.exe), and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating side-loaded via legitimate executables (e.g., Toolbox.exe). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating host reconnaissance, sent profiling data to staging server. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating downloader performed host reconnaissance, sent profiling data and System Network Configuration Discovery (T1016) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating campaign-specific infrastructure (financemachinelearning.com). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating beaconing to HTTPS C2 servers with encrypted host data in HTTP cookie headers, Ingress Tool Transfer (T1105) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating served malicious payloads via legitimate update URL, and Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography (T1573.001) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating encrypted host data embedded in HTTP cookie headers (zd_cs_pm= prefix). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including data exfiltration via HTTPS C2 servers, and long-running espionage campaign and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating named pipes used for command relay between infected systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating host profiling data collected and sent to staging server and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sPECTRALVIPER backdoor with orchestration capabilities. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (95%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (85%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (90%)
Persistence
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (90%)
Event Triggered Execution: Image File Execution Options Injection (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (85%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (90%)
Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (85%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (90%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Discovery
System Information Discovery (90%)
System Network Configuration Discovery (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (95%)
Ingress Tool Transfer (90%)
Encrypted Channel: Symmetric Cryptography (85%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (95%)
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Automated Collection (80%)

Sources & References