Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Fintech » FIN1780946825

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FIN1780946825)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-65
Company Score Before Incident768 / 1000
Company Score After Incident703 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFIN1780946825
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personally identifiable information (PII),...
INCIDENT DATE04/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Fintech's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Fintech Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Fintech breach identified under incident ID FIN1780946825.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Fintech's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fintech-net, the number of followers: 104041, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 4046 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 768 and after the incident was 703 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Fintech and their customers.

On 05 June 2026, Fintech Holdco, LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Fintech Holdco Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Consumer Information".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information (PII), including Social Security numbers.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters sent to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access may have compromised consumer data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating fintech provides B2B payment and invoice automation solutions. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and PII exposed in breach and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access may have compromised consumer data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating fintech provides B2B payment and invoice automation solutions. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting at least 58 Massachusetts residents and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating financial technology holding company with cloud-based services. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data destruction and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating b2B payment and invoice automation solutions potentially targeted. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Brute Force (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References