What is the official website of FindLaw ?

The official website of FindLaw is https://www.findlaw.com/lawyer-marketing/.

What is FindLaw's cybersecurity risk score?

FindLaw has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 754 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has FindLaw experienced?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has FindLaw been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does FindLaw have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does FindLaw have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does FindLaw comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does FindLaw have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does FindLaw comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, FindLaw is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does FindLaw have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,FindLaw is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does FindLaw operate in ?

FindLaw operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does FindLaw have ?

FindLaw employs approximately 544 people worldwide.

Does FindLaw own any subsidiaries ?

FindLaw presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does FindLaw have ?

FindLaw's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 11,381 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for FindLaw ?

FindLaw is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does FindLaw have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, FindLaw does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does FindLaw have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, FindLaw maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/findlaw.

How many cybersecurity incidents has FindLaw experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that FindLaw has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does FindLaw have ?

FindLaw has an estimated 16,201 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has FindLaw faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

FindLaw

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

754

/1000

Fair

779

/1000

Fair

FindLaw Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

findlaw.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

FindLaw s a leading provider of business development solutions for small law firms. Through its team of legal marketing experts, FindLaw drives the industry by delivering a comprehensive portfolio of proven online and offline marketing solutions designed to connect law firms with targeted prospective clients. FindLaw is also home to the largest online directory of lawyers and FindLaw.com (www.FindLaw.com), the most popular legal website with more than nine million people visiting each month for free information about a legal topic, to solve a legal problem or to find a lawyer.

FindLaw A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

FindLaw

FindLaw CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

FindLaw

Data Leak

12/2019

AVV224324123

Loading…

A.I.

FindLaw Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for FindLaw

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FindLaw in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FindLaw in 2026.

Incident Types FindLaw vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FindLaw in 2026.

Incident History - FindLaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

FindLaw Subsidiaries

FindLaw

Law Practice

Website: https://www.findlaw.com/lawyer-marketing/

Company Size: 544

Internet BrandsSoftware Development

WebMDTechnology, Information and Internet

iMatrixAdvertising Services

AvvoLegal Services

Avvo for LawyersLegal Services

DemandforceSoftware Development

Fodor's TravelBook and Periodical Publishing

NoloLegal Services

Martindale-AvvoLegal Services

Martindale-NoloAdvertising Services

Ngage Live ChatTechnology, Information and Internet

SatisFacts & ApartmentRatingsResearch Services

CaptorraSoftware Development

Martindale-HubbellLegal Services

Loading…

FindLaw Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

FindLaw CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

July 29, 2024 07:00 AM

Leak Reveals Israeli Government Interfered With WhatsApp's Lawsuit Against Spyware Company

Leaked docs reveal that Israel tried to impede a lawsuit by WhatsApp over spyware attacks from an Israeli company through a secret gag...

Read Article

August 10, 2021 07:00 AM

Is the Pandemic the Push Legal Needed to Really Embrace Technology?

Like so many employers, law firms were resistant to the idea of letting employees work from home or relying too much on technology - until...

Read Article

April 20, 2020 07:00 AM

Do Lawyers Need Encrypted Messaging Apps for Client Communications?

Isn't it a no brainer that lawyers DO need encrypted messaging for client communications? Learn more from FindLaw's Technologist blog.

Read Article

February 19, 2020 08:00 AM

Does the App Tiktok Violate Child Privacy Laws?

Have concerns about your kid using TikTok? This FindLaw blog post explains what you need to know.

Read Article

February 14, 2020 08:00 AM

The Recent Spate of Law Firm Hacks, Explained

A hacker group is targeting law firms with ransomware. Read about it on FindLaw's Technologist.

Read Article

October 28, 2019 07:00 AM

One in Four Law Firms Have Experienced a Security Breach

Despite the legal industry's heightened focus on cybersecurity, data breaches remain a significant threat for law firms.

Read Article

September 18, 2019 07:00 AM

Are Your X-Rays on the Internet?

The privacy of medical records can seem like a tough balance. On the one hand, you don't want health data like X-rays, MRIs,...

Read Article

July 10, 2019 07:00 AM

The Cryptic Ethics of Unencrypted Emails

Sending unencrypted emails to clients can put your firm at risk. Read more on FindLaw's Strategist.

Read Article

April 24, 2019 07:00 AM

Can Hackers Shut Down Your Car While You're Driving?

One hacker was able to access location data for tens of thousands of vehicles, and even turn off their engines remotely.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…