Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |
VS
General MotorsGeneral Motors
Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Scania Luleå, Ferruform AB (juridiskt namn), är ett fristående helägt dotterbolag till Scania. Vi är centrum för Scanias tillverkning av ramkomponenter i höghållfasta material. Vi möjliggör omställningen till elektrifierade transportlösningar!

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:135
Subsidiaries:66
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
General Motors

General Motors

100 Renaissance Center, Detroit, 48243, US

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.gm.com
723/1000Moderate

General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:110,879
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
General Motors

General Motors

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

General Motors has 194.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - General Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB |

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
General Motors

General Motors

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GENMINGEN1789131033
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GEN1779899842
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PTC1774441546

FAQ

Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | company and General Motors company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | and General Motors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | and General Motors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | or General Motors ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | or General Motors ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | and General Motors, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Scania Luleå | Ferruform AB | and General Motors, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93291
SUMMARY

Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93290
SUMMARY

Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93289
SUMMARY

The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-88956
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-88761
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6