Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) CouncilU.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council
VS
State of OregonState of Oregon
U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

Washington, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cio.gov
743/1000Moderate

The United States Federal CIO Council is the principal interagency forum to improve agency practices related to the design, acquisition, development, modernization, sustainment, use, sharing, and performance of Federal Government information technology (IT). The CIO Co...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
State of Oregon

State of Oregon

Salem, 97301, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.oregon.gov/
742/1000Moderate

Official LinkedIn page for the state of Oregon. Oregon is a state in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. It is located on the Pacific coast, with Washington to the north, California to the south, Nevada on the southeast and Idaho to the east. The Columbia...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,654
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Oregon

State of Oregon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Oregon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FED4892648103125
State of Oregon

State of Oregon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA1771960935

FAQ

Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council company and State of Oregon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council and State of Oregon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council and State of Oregon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council or State of Oregon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council or State of Oregon ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council and State of Oregon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Federal Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council and State of Oregon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA