Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » FBI Cyber Division » FBIUSDFIF1781267103

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FBIUSDFIF1781267103)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident726 / 1000
Company Score After Incident705 / 1000
Company LinkView FBI Cyber Division Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFBIUSDFIF1781267103
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access to Drones
DATA EXPOSEDSurveillance footage, facial recognition data,...
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of FBI Cyber Division's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts FBI Cyber Division Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the FBI Cyber Division breach identified under incident ID FBIUSDFIF1781267103.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of FBI Cyber Division's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fbicyber, the number of followers: 214806, the industry type: Law Enforcement and the number of employees: 358 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 726 and after the incident was 705 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on FBI Cyber Division and their customers.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) recently reported "Iran-Linked Hacker Group Claims FBI Drone Breach, Threatens World Cup Security", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

An Iran-affiliated hacker group, Handala, has claimed responsibility for breaching FBI-operated drones, alleging access to surveillance footage, facial recognition data, and license plate scans used for counterterrorism.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting FBI-operated drones, and exposing Surveillance footage, facial recognition data, license plate scans.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including unauthorized Access to Drones, and fBI-operated drones deployed for counterterrorism and Valid Accounts (T1078) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating handala claimed infiltration of drones for months. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation (T1098) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating alleged access to drones for months. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Archive Collected Data (T1560) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating capturing every image and every suspect from FPV drones and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating surveillance footage, facial recognition data, license plate scans. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating alleged data exfiltration claimed by threat actor. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating veiled threat against the 2026 FIFA World Cup and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential risks to teams and events. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating previous hack of FBI officials email account. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrated the drones for months. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (40%)
Persistence
Account Manipulation (50%)
Collection
Archive Collected Data (70%)
Automated Collection (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Defacement (60%)
Service Stop (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (40%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References