Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » FBI Cyber Division » FBI1775255800

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FBI1775255800)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-69
Company Score Before Incident707 / 1000
Company Score After Incident638 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFBI1775255800
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party compromise (ISP)
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive law enforcement intelligence and...
INCIDENT DATE01/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of FBI Cyber Division's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts FBI Cyber Division Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the FBI Cyber Division breach identified under incident ID FBI1775255800.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of FBI Cyber Division's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/fbicyber, the number of followers: 214806, the industry type: Law Enforcement and the number of employees: 358 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 707 and after the incident was 638 with a difference of -69 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on FBI Cyber Division and their customers.

On 02 April 2025, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) disclosed Cyber Espionage issues under the banner "FBI Network Breach Classified as 'Major Incident'".

The FBI has designated a recent breach of its internal networks as a 'major incident' after detecting abnormal activity on a network used for surveillance operations and law enforcement intelligence.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal FBI networks for surveillance and intelligence, and exposing Sensitive law enforcement intelligence and surveillance data.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Ongoing remediation efforts.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting a commercial internet service provider (ISP) to bypass FBI security controls and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a commercial ISP to bypass FBI security controls. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Modify Cloud Compute Infrastructure (T1578) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypass FBI security controls via ISP exploitation and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating abnormal activity on a network used for surveillance operations. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting a commercial ISP to bypass security controls. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive law enforcement intelligence and surveillance data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating network used for surveillance operations and law enforcement intelligence. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating major incident classification for significant harm to U.S. interests and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a commercial ISP for access. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Proxy (T1090) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting a commercial ISP to bypass FBI security controls. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Defense Evasion
Modify Cloud Compute Infrastructure (70%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Command and Control
Proxy (70%)

Sources & References