Comparison Overview

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

VS

SAPS

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 600 and 649

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier law enforcement agency in the world. We are an intelligence-driven, outcome-focused national security organization. Steeped in a history of innovation and determination, the Bureau is a collective of individuals united under one unwavering mission: to protect the American people and uphold the U.S. Constitution. The FBI mission guides our efforts and focuses our resources on critical threats, while our core values—respect, integrity, accountability, leadership, compassion, fairness, and rigorous obedience to the Constitution—serve as the foundation of everything we do. The FBI has more than 500 purpose-driven careers—such as special agent, forensic accountant, victim specialist, and IT specialist—to safeguard the nation against cyberattacks, financial fraud, organized crime, and more. We leverage our varied backgrounds, from art history to engineering, to investigate illegal activity. The FBI collaborates worldwide with law enforcement partners and intelligence agencies, providing resources including biometric identification, laboratory examinations, comprehensive training, and more. And while you are investing in us, the FBI is investing in you: Bureau benefits include unparalleled leadership development, advancement and growth opportunities, and an impactful career that enables our workforce to evolve with the mission. Set yourself apart by joining the FBI. Apply today. Note: Submit tips at tips.fbi.gov. Public info may be used for authorized purposes only: justice.gov/doj/privacy-policy.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 10,118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

SAPS

ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Policing in South Africa. I am attached to the newly formed Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations. Formally I was attached to the Detecitve Service and have been conduction investigations for over 25 years. I have also been attached to the National Inspectorate Division of the SAPS for soem 10 years.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 15,451
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fbi.jpeg
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SAPS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SAPS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 72.22% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAPS in 2026.

Incident History — Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SAPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fbi.jpeg
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Password spraying, MFA fatigue (push bombing)
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Financial gain (ransomware payments), Political/ideological (anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing (Password Reuse Exploitation), Infostealer Malware (Browser/Email Client Credential Theft), Targeted Phishing/Social Engineering, Dark Web/Encrypted Messaging Platforms (Telegram, Signal), Mainstream Platforms (TikTok, X)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Selling Access for $40–$X per Account), Fraud (Impersonation, Forged EDRs, Malware Distribution), Exploitation of Institutional Trust, Access to Premium OSINT Tools, Data Theft (IP Addresses, Emails, Phone Numbers)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Radical Ideology Proliferation
Motivation: Radical Ideology, Political Motives
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SAPS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SAPS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SAPS company has not reported any.

In the current year, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has reported more cyber incidents than SAPS company.

Neither SAPS company nor Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SAPS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SAPS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company nor SAPS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company nor SAPS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SAPS company employs more people globally than Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) nor SAPS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H